Now, the ink of the agreement between the US and the Afghan Taliban in Doha, Qatar's capital, has not dried up again, with bloodshed resuming. Although initially every country, including the Afghan government, welcomed the deal, The controversy erupted when President Ashraf Ghani made a statement that “we are not bound to release Taliban prisoners.” The Taliban were just waiting as they immediately called upon Afghan troops and attacked them. There was a significant loss of life. The United States, in turn, hid the support of the Afghan government and bombed Taliban bases. On this occasion, the US said it was committed to the defense of the Afghan government.news world ahmed
Begin the real test of peace or civil war, Afghan leadership
Most of the points of the agreement signed in Doha on February 29 are the same, which have been mentioned since February last year. The US and Taliban have repeatedly reaffirmed these points. Such as the gradual withdrawal of US troops, the release of prisoners, keeping the Afghan soil free from all forms of violence and not allowing it to be used against other countries. An important point of the agreement is also the "Afghan Interaction Dialogue," which in plain language means formulating a dialogue and power sharing formula between the current Afghan government and the Taliban. The agreement, which was attended by representatives of more than fifty countries, was praised worldwide and called a victory for peace.
The Afghan Taliban regard it as the focus of their struggle, while the US has given it the title of its successful foreign policy. There has never been a peace treaty in the world that has been initiated automatically. In fact, the handwriting on a piece of paper does not bring peace, but it is the determination, desire or compulsion of the parties behind it. The United States wants to end its long war and return to its forces, so the Taliban want to gain power in the country and escape further fighting. In other words, both sides are tired of the eighteen-year war. If that were not the case, the negotiating table would not have sunk.
Begin the real test of peace or civil war, Afghan leadership
You may recall that once before, there was an agreement to withdraw foreign troops from Afghanistan. Russian forces withdrew from Afghanistan after the "Geneva Peace Agreement", which took place thirty years ago. The other party to this agreement was the Afghan Mujahideen and the treaty was also declared a historic victory of the Mujahideen. Pakistan was also a facilitator and party. At that time, Pakistan, the United States, Europe and several Muslim countries helped Afghan mujahideen. The foreign forces left Afghanistan in light of the agreement, but the real challenge was the power sharing between the Mujahideen and the Afghan government. However, they became so obsessed with the power of the brother that the brother's blood was not respected, and the natives went down to kill each other. The difficulty was that Islamabad could not distance itself from the dispute at this stage. However, the biggest challenge for him was the 75 million Afghan refugees who were displaced by the war and hosted by Pakistan. Had the situation improved, these refugees would have returned to their homes, which would have benefited Pakistan as well. With each other's fighting, Afghanistan collapsed and turned into ruins. There were so many casualties and disasters in this civil war that Russia was not even at war. Then the atrocity also happened that the world was watching the spectacle. The Afghan people looked forward to the path to independence, for which millions of Afghans were hit by a superpower. Where prosperity was to come in these circumstances, further calamity and destruction became their hallmark.current world news
Even today, the main challenge facing the Afghan government and the Taliban is that they do not want to repeat the history. What happened in the past Who played the role? Who was supporter, against whom? All these things will continue to be settled later, the most important thing is the protection of our homeland and the people. It is time for decisions to go beyond the personal interests of the parties. It is to be seen how Ashraf Ghani and the Taliban make conscious decisions at this stage. There is much mention of this and it is true that the Afghans have been defeating the major powers on their land, but have they managed to turn this defeat into a victory? Can they make their homeland a prosperous, sovereign country? Or just spend the game of victory and defeat and not give anything but blood to your people. Could they become big powers themselves by defeating the big powers or was there any other benefit from this accomplishment? Afghan collective wisdom and politics need to think a lot in this regard.current world news
It's easy to say that the Great Game is happening. Afghanistan's geographical significance is in its place, but how to use peace to its advantage? This is the test of Afghan leadership. Other wars
It's easy to say that the Great Game is happening. Afghanistan's geographical significance is in its place, but how to use peace to its advantage? This is the test of Afghan leadership. Otherwise, winning wars and achieving achievements is nothing new, as has always been the case in the world. In this regard, the Taliban should set the example of Vietnam. One who has joined the emerging economies of the world today. I do not live in the past, she learns from it. In the past, the empire of Roma was undeniably superpowered, but is Italy like this today?
The kind of reaction to the release of prisoners immediately after the deal, has again created the question whether the Afghan leadership (government and Taliban) has the capacity to make peace? War is an emergency and emotional process, it has to end, but the struggle for peace and development in a nation's life is a very enduring phase. It has to work instead of killing emotions and dying. Service and happiness is the ultimate goal. It also requires continuity of leadership. That is why the democratic system is considered the best. At the end of the revolution and the struggle for independence, the real test begins.
Now the competitors have their own people, how to satisfy them and how to utilize their abilities. This work can only lead to a leadership that is incapable of making decisions beyond caste and group bias. However, the Afghan leadership has been lacking in this virtue. They are unable to do anything, lose opportunities. Are. Someone sits them at the table, negotiates, agrees to the contract, assists them in their development, so they still don't get one. See, this time they benefit from the opportunity they have for peace promotion in the form of a peace treaty. Certainly there is an easy way to reject that deal and get back on the path of bloodshed, but in peace and development. Changing is a difficult journey and test. As can be seen, the Ghanaian government was excluded in the process of contracting, which gave rise to complaints.
The US made it a legally legitimate party by talking to the Taliban directly, but the Afghan government they brought to the US made it illegal. Ashraf Ghani is probably expressing his displeasure over this. The February agreement, in a way, only paves the way for the return of US troops. How can peace be established in Afghanistan? This will be set in the Afghan Dialog. Therefore, Afghanistan's construction, development and political stability are linked to this inter-Afghan dialogue. It was probably thought that if it was decided by the United States itself, it would be called dictation, but if Afghan parties were given the opportunity to work, they would prove to be competent. How much homework was done to get closer to the Taliban and the Afghan government? There are two fundamental problems in this regard.
One is that the views of the Taliban and the government are completely different. Both want to establish their own system of government. The second problem is that the Taliban is no longer Afghanistan, which was twenty-five years ago. There is a regular government in the country, a political and administrative system. The army, the administration and the police. The people have become accustomed to it, so will they accept the Taliban's system now? It is a must see. The Taliban struggle in their place, but now it is a matter of running the country. They will disappoint the people and their countrymen by not showing flexibility in the situation. They are no longer occupied like the days of the Mullahs, but they have to assure the public that they have a better system of governance.
The US is leaving Afghanistan, but to say that it is going to be defeated, it has to be understood with the help of some things. It is to be seen whether the Afghan war damaged its economy as it did on Britain in the First and Second World Wars. Did this eighteen-year war strike its unity as it did on the Soviet Union? Did the withdrawal of Iraq and Afghanistan oust the United States from the position of superpower? Everyone will continue to answer these questions on the basis of their own taste and knowledge, but the fact is that the happiness and victory of victory does not decide the future of the mourning nations. In this case, leadership has to do with how they adapt to the situation and how they benefit their people. China and Russia are Afghanistan's neighbors and great powers. Russia is a war-torn country, but tried to repair its relations with the Taliban because it could not tolerate any unrest at its border in the economic downturn it is undergoing.
President Putin put most of his focus on economic recovery. Then more than the United States, he is worried about China, which has become an economic giant. China has rapidly reached the main stage of the world, but the Corona virus has caused it extraordinary shock, requiring at least a year to recover. However, the issue of Xinjiang is also very important to him, which is his largest province and where there is a majority of Muslims. Will he accept a Taliban-like government along its border, with its effects embedded in its territory? India has had good relations with Afghanistan in the past.
The construction of the road from the Iranian Chabahar Port to Kabul, the Sapphire Dam on Iran, the Afghan border and India have been instrumental in the restoration of Afghanistan. But what role will it have in the new situation? This toocurrent world news
We could not manage to restrict them to campuses like Iran, they remain like free citizens on our land. Negative effects continue to spread in the society, where extremism is the most annoying problem. Assess the complexity of such problems. It can be argued that the pressure of Syrian refugees in Turkey increased, it opened the gates of Europe. We regard our relations with Afghanistan as a religious and historical heritage. Most of our heroes belong to Afghanistan and Central Asia, whose examples of courage and bravery we have a wonderful history. Will there be any new history written now? These are ideological issues, but how can relations with the Muslim world in Central Asia be strengthened? This too will be a very important issue for Pakistan. SeaPak Shah routes, but the natural route goes through Afghanistan.
Central Asia is no longer Soviet, when the Afghan government is close to it and India was the nearest ally of the Soviet Union. There are now ten Muslim states, rich in natural resources and possibilities, which are completely independent of Russia. How can we reach them? Certainly foreign policy makers may have done homework in this regard. We will have to put our wider interests ahead of the Afghan factions' politics, otherwise someone else will fill the gap. Such a situation has been frequent with us. We live in a world of dreams and ideologies, whether Muslim countries or any other state, looking at concrete economic issues. Of course, our economic conditions cannot afford to lose opportunities in Central Asia.current world news
