Lahore: The bench of the Lahore High Court has given remarks during a hearing on three miscellaneous petitions filed by former President General (retd) Pervez Musharraf that he could not hear the appeal against Musharraf's conviction; no.news world ahmed
Phil Bench said you should take the time and come up with the preparations, this is the important thing you do not take it easy. Pervez Musharraf's lawyer Azhar Siddique Advocate said Nawaz Sharif made the case for personal reasons. The court addressed Barrister Ali Zafar and asked him to come forward and assist.current world news
Musharraf's plea hearing against special court
The court dismissed Musharraf's plea to stop the execution, directed the lawyers to come in and demand a record in connection with the formation of a special court. A full bench comprising Justice Muhammad Amir Bhatti and Justice Chaudhry Masood Jahangir chaired the hearing of the Lahore High Court headed by Justice Syed Mazhar Ali Akbar Naqvi.
Pervez Musharraf's various treason cases were challenged, including the decision of a serious treason case against him, the establishment of a trial court and a complaint filed by the then government.
During the hearing, the Fazil Bench asked Pervez Musharraf's lawyers what was your case, on which the bench was told that Pervez Musharraf's case is straightforward and that the formation of a special court is illegal. Pervez Musharraf has challenged the move to set up a special court and start an inquiry. If the premise of a building is wrong, it will collapse.
The court expressed his displeasure over the lack of proper support and asked that you read your case, did you prepare the case? Phil Bench addressed Barrister Ali Zafar, who is in the courtroom, to which he said that I have come here to hear the case, to which the court said that you should come forward and the extra bench sought his assistance.current world news
Phil Bench told Pervez Musharraf's lawyer that you should take the time and come up with a preparation, this is an important matter. You should not take it easy. Pervez Musharraf's lawyer Azhar Siddique Advocate argued that the then Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif made the case for personal reasons, the Serious Treason Act was amended in 2010 and the process of emergency enforcement was included.
On this, Justice Mazhar Ali Akbar Naqvi said that the court had asked the question that suspension of the Constitution and imposition of emergency are two different things. Justice Mohammad Amir Bhatti asked whether the President should be imposed on the emergency or the general? The Chief Executive has been used to respond to judicial inquiries, while Justice Masood Jehangir asked if the actions of October 12 and November 3 are not two different things.
Justice Mazhar Ali Akbar Naqvi asked that under which section the trial court charged Pervez Musharraf, Additional Attorney General Ishtiaq A Khan read the crime in the court. Ishtiaq A. Khan said that the person wrote in the crime that the constitution was broken by imposing an emergency.
Later, the court adjourned the hearing for a while and Fazal Bench Chief Justice Muzaffar Ali Akbar Naqvi said that Pervez Musharraf's lawyers decided who should give arguments on the case.
After the break-up, when the hearing started, Justice Mazhar Ali Akbar Naqvi said that after the complaint was registered, inquiry tak current world news es place, inquiry in this case has taken place first and the complaint was registered later.
Justice Amir Bhatti said that the Attorney General wrote a letter to the Cabinet to start the inquiry, if the Cabinet approved or answered it, where is the answer? To which the federal government's lawyer said no response from the cabinet was on the record.
Justice Masood Jehangir addressed the federal government lawyer and said that no cabinet approval was allowed in this case nor the federal government has asked for inquiry.
