The Supreme Court of India dismissed the requests of Shiite Waqf boards and soft-hearted Akhada.
The Supreme Court of India has ruled that the demolition of the Babri Masjid, it is illegal to have an idol in it, has found evidence of Muslims praying in the inner parts of the Babri Masjid.
The Indian Supreme Court, in its decision, said that it is not appropriate for the court to speak on religion or belief.news world ahmed
The court ruled that the Babri Masjid was not built on an empty plot; there were structures under the Babri Masjid that were not Islamic. According to historical evidence, the birth of Ayodhya Ram was born.news world ahmed
The Supreme Court of India has today announced a long dispute between Babri Masjid and Ram Temple in Ayodhya, before which security was tightened all over India, including Ayodhya.
A five-member bench, headed by Indian Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, ruled out the long-standing controversy at the temple mosque, with Ranjan Gogoi retiring on November 17.
According to the British Broadcasting Agency, five judges read their verdict one by one. Justice Nazir is the only Muslim judge on this bench.
ALSO READ: 5 Hour Hearing Instead Of 4 In The Babri Masjid Case
The Babri Masjid was martyred on December 6, 1992, the Supreme Court completed the hearing of the Babri Masjid case on October 16, 2019.news world ahmed
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on this occasion appealed to the people to keep the peace.
Section 144 was enforced in Ayodhya to increase security to protect important shrines, including the disputed site, where counter-terrorism troops were deployed at several places.news world ahmed
The martyrdom of the Babri Masjid was treacherous, should be avoided with shame, Indian President
Hindu extremists martyred Babri Masjid on December 6, 1992, claiming that there was a temple before the mosque was built, a case has been filed in Allahabad High Court after the mosque's martyrdom.ahmed
The High Court, in its judgment on September 30, 2010, said that the 2.77 acres of Ayodhya should be divided into 3 parts, one-third of the land will go to the Ram Lila Temple, one-third to the Sunni dedicated board and the remaining one-third. The land will get soft ground.ahmed
Fourteen appeals were filed in the Supreme Court against the High Court decision.
The Supreme Court of India had completed the hearing of the Babri Masjid case on October 16, 2019. The decision of the case has been pronounced today.
Babri Masjid, what is the history of Ram temple dispute?
The Babri Masjid and Ram Temple Conflict is a religious, political and historical debate that has been going on in India for 27 years.news world ahmed
The Babri Masjid, named after the Mughal king Zaheer-ud-din Babar, was built in Ayodhya in 1528, while a Hindu group claimed that the Babri Masjid was demolished by Ram Mandir.
Religious controversy began in 1853 at the site of the Babri Masjid after the Hindu group claimed it.
In 1859, the British administration overseeing the Muslim Hindu conflict had set up fences around it and marked separate places of worship for both Muslims and Hindus, and this continued for about 90 years.news world ahmed
This property dispute first went to the Indian court in 1949 after the Ram idols were placed inside the Babri Masjid.news world ahmed
Then in 1984, the Hindu group formed a committee to construct the Ram Temple, after which three years later a district court ordered the opening of the Babri Masjid after about five decades and allowed Hindus to worship in the mosque. Given.
After which the Muslim groups formed the Babri Masjid Action Committee and in 1989 the temple was laid on this land.
In 1990, then BJP president LK Advani got support for the construction of Ram temple at Babri Masjid and Babri Masjid was partially damaged by volunteers of Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP). ۔
On December 6, 1992, Hindu activists demolished the Babri Masjid, following which religious riots broke out in India.
Ten days after the incident, the Liberhan Commission was prepared to investigate the incident and the Commission submitted its inquiry report in June 2009, 17 years after the incident.
In September 2003, an Indian court ruled that a case should be registered against some BJP leaders in the demolition of Babri Masjid, but LK Advani was not charged in that decision as he was present. The Deputy Prime Minister was.news world ahmed
A year later, a Uttar Pradesh court ruled that the amnesty sought by the leaders should be reviewed.
In April 2002, a 3-judge bench of the Lucknow High Court of Allahabad began hearing the determination of the owner of the Babri Masjid and the Ram temple site.news world ahmed
In September 2010, the Allahabad court ruled that the area should be divided into 3 parts, after which Hindu groups and Muslim groups challenged the High Court and approached the Supreme Court.
In 2011, the Supreme Court stayed the hearing of the case on the order of the Allahabad High Court and declared the High Court decision strange and shocking.news world ahmed
Earlier this year, a five-judge Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court of India began hearing the case daily from August 6 and the daily hearing ended on October 16 after 40 days. ) The verdict was pronounced.
